Tim Tebow demoted to No. 3 in Denver
Tim Tebow is now the Broncos’ third string quarterback. Tim Tebow was bumped down to third string on Sunday after initial hopes that Tebow could sit at the second string for the team. Earlier in September, Tebow was designated Broncos’ backup for Kyle Orton. At the time Adam Shefter had reported that the Broncos had an offensive plan in plan when Tebow played to draw from his skills.
Brady Quinn was active on Sunday as Kyle Orton's backup. It was a little strange that Tebow wasn't active as at least a running option with running back Knowshon Moreno hurt.
Tebow had been the No. 2 quarterback in each of the first two weeks, with Brady Quinn leapfrogging the rookie for backup duty this last week.
Coach Josh McDaniels said that Tim Tebow's demotion to emergency third quarterback was based on last week's practices.
Tebow has said he had made changes to his game. But those changes were apparently not enough to get picked over Quinn. “It’s not like it feels awkward to me now. I’m excited about the changes I’ve made.”
Posted by Commish at 9/27/2010 11:06 AM 
Categories: General, Broncos, Bust, Denver, Josh McDaniels
Tags: Broncos Bust Denver Josh McDaniels
Categories: General, Broncos, Bust, Denver, Josh McDaniels
Tags: Broncos Bust Denver Josh McDaniels
This has to be the dumbest website I've ever seen. Why exactly did someone take the time to create a website dedicated to hating someone and pointing out any and all mistakes? Oh wait! It's because he is a very athletic and skilled football quarterback, who is a christian and stands by what he believes. You should change the name to HatingTebowsCharacter.com
Reply to this
Looks like you need to update your lame ass website. Tebow has the starting job in denver, but you probably already kow that since you spend your life worshipping his every move. Looks like hes your messiah. I dont blame you for dedicating a website to him.
Reply to this
Wow, he became the starter at the end if I'm not mistaken.
Reply to this
where all da new posts at?
Reply to this